<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aluminumstudios.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com</link>
	<description>the photography of William Milberry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by wmilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>wmilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Paul,
If you are going to leave a comment please try to be a little more civil and adult about it.

First of all, be careful not to misquote people.  I never said &quot;&lt;em&gt;you say that everyone at the time of the accident in Japan is going to die.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;  I never make such extreme statements.  I also do my best to avoid making hard statements about things which I don&#039;t have clear support for.

Also, I am anything but alarmist.  I provide analysis and discussion based on available information (not speculation and pseudo-science like many &quot;truthers&quot; do on various blogs and youtube channels.)  I provide relevant links for people to go and investigate themselves to decide if they agree with me or to confirm what I a presenting.

It IS bad to be alarmist and say the situation is much worse than the evidence indicates.  It&#039;s equally irresponsible to tell people &quot;everything is fine&quot; just to make them feel better when the situation is clearly not fine.  The goal is to follow the data and gain as much of an understanding of the situation as is possible.  How people handle the understanding is another issue.  It sounds like you may not have been able to handle it so well and are still suffering anger over it.

Information is the most important thing and armed with information, such as knowledge of the random sampling results which I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JUx3guPOKc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussed here&lt;/a&gt; or information about contamination in green tea like I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKTJ47R-hNw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussed here&lt;/a&gt;, people can make more careful and informed decisions on how to protect themselves.  

I have a reasonable scientific background, work experience in research labs, a close family member who was an engineer in the nuclear industry, and do read (and understand) scientific literature.  So kindly direct your criticisms at the people who are finding implausible amounts of radiation in rainwater, claiming to have identified Neptunium with little more than a Geiger counter, and blaming every dead tree leaf on Fukushima.  

William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
If you are going to leave a comment please try to be a little more civil and adult about it.</p>
<p>First of all, be careful not to misquote people.  I never said &#8220;<em>you say that everyone at the time of the accident in Japan is going to die.</em>&#8221;  I never make such extreme statements.  I also do my best to avoid making hard statements about things which I don&#8217;t have clear support for.</p>
<p>Also, I am anything but alarmist.  I provide analysis and discussion based on available information (not speculation and pseudo-science like many &#8220;truthers&#8221; do on various blogs and youtube channels.)  I provide relevant links for people to go and investigate themselves to decide if they agree with me or to confirm what I a presenting.</p>
<p>It IS bad to be alarmist and say the situation is much worse than the evidence indicates.  It&#8217;s equally irresponsible to tell people &#8220;everything is fine&#8221; just to make them feel better when the situation is clearly not fine.  The goal is to follow the data and gain as much of an understanding of the situation as is possible.  How people handle the understanding is another issue.  It sounds like you may not have been able to handle it so well and are still suffering anger over it.</p>
<p>Information is the most important thing and armed with information, such as knowledge of the random sampling results which I <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JUx3guPOKc" rel="nofollow">discussed here</a> or information about contamination in green tea like I <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKTJ47R-hNw" rel="nofollow">discussed here</a>, people can make more careful and informed decisions on how to protect themselves.  </p>
<p>I have a reasonable scientific background, work experience in research labs, a close family member who was an engineer in the nuclear industry, and do read (and understand) scientific literature.  So kindly direct your criticisms at the people who are finding implausible amounts of radiation in rainwater, claiming to have identified Neptunium with little more than a Geiger counter, and blaming every dead tree leaf on Fukushima.  </p>
<p>William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Hi William,

I was living in Japan since march until November. I could not handle my stress about food, so I came back to my country. I was living in Ishikawa prefecture, and at the time of the Fukushima accident I was in Osaka. But I can not understand why are you still there? I mean, you uploaded all this videos, you are telling all about this information about the corrupt government...WTF is wrong with you?? If you say that  everyone at the time of the accident in Japan is going to die, WTF with you?? Still there?? why?

Just please... don&#039;t label your videos with alarmist names to attract more attention, and I suggest you to read official information about previous nuclear accidents and the health effects from those accidents from sources like WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR and really scientific people and researchers that were for example at Chernobyl studying the health effects  in the contaminated areas or those who were at the time of the accident. Instead of saying that everyone will die from Fukushima.

I am not saying that everything is OK and that the Japanese Government is saying the truth, we all now that the Japanese Government is corrupt, but I invite you to read scientific information about the risks of radiation and at what level are dangerous.

PS. People that were at Chernobyl had more mental problems than health problems, because they were told that everyone there will have cancer from the Idione 131, cesium 134 and 137 and that they will die. So they became alcoholics and many others suicide without having any disease. William, let&#039;s think about the people near Fukushima or in Japan, that were seeing all the videos and info you posted, and the mental stress that you are causing. We don&#039;t know how many people will die from Fukushima, in a alarmist view: let say everyone in Japan, we can do anything to mitigate the effects of radiation, but please, don&#039;t stress the people  any more, don&#039;t make the problem bigger.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William,</p>
<p>I was living in Japan since march until November. I could not handle my stress about food, so I came back to my country. I was living in Ishikawa prefecture, and at the time of the Fukushima accident I was in Osaka. But I can not understand why are you still there? I mean, you uploaded all this videos, you are telling all about this information about the corrupt government&#8230;WTF is wrong with you?? If you say that  everyone at the time of the accident in Japan is going to die, WTF with you?? Still there?? why?</p>
<p>Just please&#8230; don&#8217;t label your videos with alarmist names to attract more attention, and I suggest you to read official information about previous nuclear accidents and the health effects from those accidents from sources like WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR and really scientific people and researchers that were for example at Chernobyl studying the health effects  in the contaminated areas or those who were at the time of the accident. Instead of saying that everyone will die from Fukushima.</p>
<p>I am not saying that everything is OK and that the Japanese Government is saying the truth, we all now that the Japanese Government is corrupt, but I invite you to read scientific information about the risks of radiation and at what level are dangerous.</p>
<p>PS. People that were at Chernobyl had more mental problems than health problems, because they were told that everyone there will have cancer from the Idione 131, cesium 134 and 137 and that they will die. So they became alcoholics and many others suicide without having any disease. William, let&#8217;s think about the people near Fukushima or in Japan, that were seeing all the videos and info you posted, and the mental stress that you are causing. We don&#8217;t know how many people will die from Fukushima, in a alarmist view: let say everyone in Japan, we can do anything to mitigate the effects of radiation, but please, don&#8217;t stress the people  any more, don&#8217;t make the problem bigger.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by wmilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>wmilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Richard, thanks for taking time to leave this message.  Your compliments are encouraging and hearing other people&#039;s stories reminds me that I&#039;m not alone in all this craziness.  It must have been hard to leave, but I think you did the right thing.  Even though you got some external exposure, by leaving you are avoiding what I believe to be the greatest danger - internal exposure through the ever more contaminated food supply.  Even though I&#039;m some distance away, Fukushima is slowly being delivered to everyone in Japan through municipalities voluntarily accepting radioactive tsunami rubble for burning plus the food :-\   I&#039;m envious of you.

Take care.

-Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, thanks for taking time to leave this message.  Your compliments are encouraging and hearing other people&#8217;s stories reminds me that I&#8217;m not alone in all this craziness.  It must have been hard to leave, but I think you did the right thing.  Even though you got some external exposure, by leaving you are avoiding what I believe to be the greatest danger &#8211; internal exposure through the ever more contaminated food supply.  Even though I&#8217;m some distance away, Fukushima is slowly being delivered to everyone in Japan through municipalities voluntarily accepting radioactive tsunami rubble for burning plus the food :-\   I&#8217;m envious of you.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>-Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Hi William,
I want to commend and thank you for your excellent material on the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe. I am relieved to see you are some distance from Fukushima Daiichi and the plume emanating from it. I was a long term Japan resident until the end of July - I decided to leave after getting high readings at home in Tokyo on a SPER 840007. This happened on two occasions, once in May and once in June, for about two hours each time - readings were reaching the end of the analogue scale plus &quot;beeping&quot; - according to the instruction manual, &quot;beeping will begin approximately at 15mR/hr&quot; -  I think this equates to 150 micro Sv/h.  I am unaware of any public warnings being issued at or soon after those occasions, although perhaps this is moot as there was probably little one could have done to avoid exposure to what I guess was gamma radiation from some highly irradiated noble gas. Whether or not such irradiated gas would have been accompanied by higher concentrations of hot particles (the inhalation of which may be ameliorated by use of a suitable face mask e.g. 3M 8210Plus) is another question.
Thank heavens there are honest individuals such as yourself who are striving to provide credible, objective information on the situation in Japan.
Best wishes,
Richard now 7800km away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William,<br />
I want to commend and thank you for your excellent material on the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe. I am relieved to see you are some distance from Fukushima Daiichi and the plume emanating from it. I was a long term Japan resident until the end of July &#8211; I decided to leave after getting high readings at home in Tokyo on a SPER 840007. This happened on two occasions, once in May and once in June, for about two hours each time &#8211; readings were reaching the end of the analogue scale plus &#8220;beeping&#8221; &#8211; according to the instruction manual, &#8220;beeping will begin approximately at 15mR/hr&#8221; &#8211;  I think this equates to 150 micro Sv/h.  I am unaware of any public warnings being issued at or soon after those occasions, although perhaps this is moot as there was probably little one could have done to avoid exposure to what I guess was gamma radiation from some highly irradiated noble gas. Whether or not such irradiated gas would have been accompanied by higher concentrations of hot particles (the inhalation of which may be ameliorated by use of a suitable face mask e.g. 3M 8210Plus) is another question.<br />
Thank heavens there are honest individuals such as yourself who are striving to provide credible, objective information on the situation in Japan.<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Richard now 7800km away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the quick response! Really appreciate it! I agree risking radioactive exposure for a &quot;non-essential trip&quot; to Japan doesn&#039;t seem justified. The contamination of their food supply and water is a real bummer... I would still be affected even if I only visit the southern part of Japan, far away from Tokyo or Fukushima. But then visiting Japan without seeing Tokyo doesn&#039;t make much sense either, so it seems like my whole plan of traveling to Japan has to be scrapped. Do you see a reduction in 外人 visiting or living in Japan since Fukushima?

Thanks for the heads-up on the difficulty of being a vegetarian in Japan. Yes I&#039;m quite aware of that as I&#039;ve lived in and visited neighboring Asian countries of Japan (which also tend to have a similarly warped understanding of vegetarianism), and have seen how Japantowns and Japanese restaurants are like in say California, where I lived. Guess I&#039;ll get tired of plain おにぎり and 味噌汁 for every meal, everyday! ^_^ Despite that challenge I was still planing to visit Japan anyway because of my appreciation and fascination of her people, history and culture. (I always thought watching the 紅白歌合戦 live in an authentic Japanese household would be a memorable experience!) But now with the nuclear fallout, like I said it&#039;s becoming difficult to justify such a trip.

Thanks again for your time! Take care in Japan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the quick response! Really appreciate it! I agree risking radioactive exposure for a &#8220;non-essential trip&#8221; to Japan doesn&#8217;t seem justified. The contamination of their food supply and water is a real bummer&#8230; I would still be affected even if I only visit the southern part of Japan, far away from Tokyo or Fukushima. But then visiting Japan without seeing Tokyo doesn&#8217;t make much sense either, so it seems like my whole plan of traveling to Japan has to be scrapped. Do you see a reduction in 外人 visiting or living in Japan since Fukushima?</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up on the difficulty of being a vegetarian in Japan. Yes I&#8217;m quite aware of that as I&#8217;ve lived in and visited neighboring Asian countries of Japan (which also tend to have a similarly warped understanding of vegetarianism), and have seen how Japantowns and Japanese restaurants are like in say California, where I lived. Guess I&#8217;ll get tired of plain おにぎり and 味噌汁 for every meal, everyday! ^_^ Despite that challenge I was still planing to visit Japan anyway because of my appreciation and fascination of her people, history and culture. (I always thought watching the 紅白歌合戦 live in an authentic Japanese household would be a memorable experience!) But now with the nuclear fallout, like I said it&#8217;s becoming difficult to justify such a trip.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your time! Take care in Japan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by wmilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>wmilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.  That is a tough question and I&#039;m not an authority so please don&#039;t take my opinions as any kind of official advice.  I personally wouldn&#039;t visit Japan if I were you.  I wouldn&#039;t come here if I knew what I do now and didn&#039;t already live here.  I would avoid Tokyo especially (which I am doing, I really wanted to plan a trip there this year, but that&#039;s been canceled.)  My latest video (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5RSMv1TWvw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5RSMv1TWvw&lt;/a&gt;) features excessively radioactive dirt that was taken just 26 km (16 mi) away from Tokyo.  Also, research done on car air filters (&lt;a href=&quot;http://vimeo.com/31370998&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://vimeo.com/31370998&lt;/a&gt;) from Tokyo and (and Fukushima) demonstrates that there were (and probably still is to some degree), a lot of hot particles which if they get into the body can cause many health problems down the line.  It&#039;s just not worth it for a vacation IMHO.  Japan is NOT as great of a country as it was before a triple meltdown and the nuclear contamination of 10% of it&#039;s land and the government trying to contaminate the rest by allowing contaminated food to be sold and burning radioactive tsunami debris all over Japan.

Also, are you familiar with how difficult it is to be a vegetarian in Japan?  Everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) has pork, fish, or some other animal product in it and the Japanese don&#039;t understand the concept of vegetarianism at all.  Even if you say you are a vegetarian in Japanese and that you don&#039;t eat animals, they will still serve you fish, or ramen with pork in the soup and say &quot;but there&#039;s no meat in it.&quot;  A lot of restaurants don&#039;t have any good vegetarian options.  Just something to be aware of!

-Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.  That is a tough question and I&#8217;m not an authority so please don&#8217;t take my opinions as any kind of official advice.  I personally wouldn&#8217;t visit Japan if I were you.  I wouldn&#8217;t come here if I knew what I do now and didn&#8217;t already live here.  I would avoid Tokyo especially (which I am doing, I really wanted to plan a trip there this year, but that&#8217;s been canceled.)  My latest video (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5RSMv1TWvw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5RSMv1TWvw</a>) features excessively radioactive dirt that was taken just 26 km (16 mi) away from Tokyo.  Also, research done on car air filters (<a href="http://vimeo.com/31370998" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/31370998</a>) from Tokyo and (and Fukushima) demonstrates that there were (and probably still is to some degree), a lot of hot particles which if they get into the body can cause many health problems down the line.  It&#8217;s just not worth it for a vacation IMHO.  Japan is NOT as great of a country as it was before a triple meltdown and the nuclear contamination of 10% of it&#8217;s land and the government trying to contaminate the rest by allowing contaminated food to be sold and burning radioactive tsunami debris all over Japan.</p>
<p>Also, are you familiar with how difficult it is to be a vegetarian in Japan?  Everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) has pork, fish, or some other animal product in it and the Japanese don&#8217;t understand the concept of vegetarianism at all.  Even if you say you are a vegetarian in Japanese and that you don&#8217;t eat animals, they will still serve you fish, or ramen with pork in the soup and say &#8220;but there&#8217;s no meat in it.&#8221;  A lot of restaurants don&#8217;t have any good vegetarian options.  Just something to be aware of!</p>
<p>-Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Hello William,

Thank you for your YT videos on Fukushima and on the radioactivity situation in Japan. I appreciate your time and efforts in researching and producing the videos.

I was planning to visit Japan earlier this year (2011) but because of the earthquake and tsunami, I decided to wait till Feb/Mar 2012. If I don&#039;t visit Japan then I may not be able to do so for a very long time due to other demands and commitments. I&#039;m planning on visiting only areas to the south and to the west of Tokyo (and Tokyo itself), e.g.: 大阪, 名古屋, 京都, 沖縄県, etc. My question is: do you think it&#039;s safe at all to come to Japan?

Like you, I appreciate Japanese culture and aesthetic, and have been longing to visit Japan for many years. But if it means undue exposure to risk of radiation, it&#039;d be difficult to justify such a trip. As a vegan, I wouldn&#039;t care if the beef, the fish, or the dairy is bursting at the seams with cesium or plutonium, so to speak. (It still hurts a bit to see people consuming these stuff and inadvertently poisoning themselves, though.) But while in Japan I&#039;ll still drink their water, eat their rice, and breathe their air, etc. Am I putting myself in unnecessary risks simply by visiting Japan?

Thank you very much. Appreciate any thoughts you could share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello William,</p>
<p>Thank you for your YT videos on Fukushima and on the radioactivity situation in Japan. I appreciate your time and efforts in researching and producing the videos.</p>
<p>I was planning to visit Japan earlier this year (2011) but because of the earthquake and tsunami, I decided to wait till Feb/Mar 2012. If I don&#8217;t visit Japan then I may not be able to do so for a very long time due to other demands and commitments. I&#8217;m planning on visiting only areas to the south and to the west of Tokyo (and Tokyo itself), e.g.: 大阪, 名古屋, 京都, 沖縄県, etc. My question is: do you think it&#8217;s safe at all to come to Japan?</p>
<p>Like you, I appreciate Japanese culture and aesthetic, and have been longing to visit Japan for many years. But if it means undue exposure to risk of radiation, it&#8217;d be difficult to justify such a trip. As a vegan, I wouldn&#8217;t care if the beef, the fish, or the dairy is bursting at the seams with cesium or plutonium, so to speak. (It still hurts a bit to see people consuming these stuff and inadvertently poisoning themselves, though.) But while in Japan I&#8217;ll still drink their water, eat their rice, and breathe their air, etc. Am I putting myself in unnecessary risks simply by visiting Japan?</p>
<p>Thank you very much. Appreciate any thoughts you could share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Will- Thanks for the explanation.   Off to eBay it goes I&#039;m afraid.   Can you recommend something for measuring food/tea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will- Thanks for the explanation.   Off to eBay it goes I&#8217;m afraid.   Can you recommend something for measuring food/tea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by wmilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>wmilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much.  Your words are very encouraging for me.  I hope the demonstrations grow and the Japanese learn to stand up for themselves more and more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much.  Your words are very encouraging for me.  I hope the demonstrations grow and the Japanese learn to stand up for themselves more and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; Contact by wmilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.aluminumstudios.com/about#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>wmilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0169509.netsolhost.com/content/?page_id=2#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Joe,
I&#039;m afraid to say that style of Geiger counter is great for hunting down radioactive items at flea markets (uranium glass, radium watches, etc.), but it is not usable with food at all.  It&#039;s difficult to explain in brief, but if you have tea with 200 becquerels of cesium/kilogram for example, it means in 1 kilogram you get 200 emissions of beta particles per second.  Radiation radiates out more or less equally in all directions.  The Geiger-Muller tube in the DX-2 is about the size of your index finger, so if you hold it next to the tea only a few beta particles out of all of the ones radiating out will hit it.  It&#039;s like holding your finger next to a candle flame, only a small portion of the light which goes out in all directions from the candle into the room hits your finger.  Then if you factor in that Geiger counters are only 30% sensitive (on a good day), 2/3 of the radiation hitting the tube passes through it without being detected.  The result is when measuring things of a few dozen to few hundred becquerels of activity, only a handful of counts per minute register.  This gets lost into the natural background radiation which can be anywhere from 15-50 counts-per-minute depending where you are.  It&#039;s impossible to distinguish with an analog counter.  What is needed is a digital counter with a timer function.  You can take a long average reading of the background radiation, then a long average reading of the item you are testing, and compare the two averages - the difference will be what is coming from the item you are measuring.  Also, because of limited volume, tube based counters aren&#039;t very effective with food even if you can do timed averages, a pancake style Geiger-Muller tube like the Radiation Alert Inspector Geiger counters have is the most effective because it&#039;s large area can catch many more counts coming out of the food item being tested.

I hope this explanation is clear enough.  I&#039;m afraid to say that the DX-2 won&#039;t reveal anything about the tea, even if it is very contaminated.  It&#039;s a sensitive and good Geiger counter for hunting down radioactive objects and measuring medium to high levels of radiation, but it&#039;s not useful with low levels.

-Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,<br />
I&#8217;m afraid to say that style of Geiger counter is great for hunting down radioactive items at flea markets (uranium glass, radium watches, etc.), but it is not usable with food at all.  It&#8217;s difficult to explain in brief, but if you have tea with 200 becquerels of cesium/kilogram for example, it means in 1 kilogram you get 200 emissions of beta particles per second.  Radiation radiates out more or less equally in all directions.  The Geiger-Muller tube in the DX-2 is about the size of your index finger, so if you hold it next to the tea only a few beta particles out of all of the ones radiating out will hit it.  It&#8217;s like holding your finger next to a candle flame, only a small portion of the light which goes out in all directions from the candle into the room hits your finger.  Then if you factor in that Geiger counters are only 30% sensitive (on a good day), 2/3 of the radiation hitting the tube passes through it without being detected.  The result is when measuring things of a few dozen to few hundred becquerels of activity, only a handful of counts per minute register.  This gets lost into the natural background radiation which can be anywhere from 15-50 counts-per-minute depending where you are.  It&#8217;s impossible to distinguish with an analog counter.  What is needed is a digital counter with a timer function.  You can take a long average reading of the background radiation, then a long average reading of the item you are testing, and compare the two averages &#8211; the difference will be what is coming from the item you are measuring.  Also, because of limited volume, tube based counters aren&#8217;t very effective with food even if you can do timed averages, a pancake style Geiger-Muller tube like the Radiation Alert Inspector Geiger counters have is the most effective because it&#8217;s large area can catch many more counts coming out of the food item being tested.</p>
<p>I hope this explanation is clear enough.  I&#8217;m afraid to say that the DX-2 won&#8217;t reveal anything about the tea, even if it is very contaminated.  It&#8217;s a sensitive and good Geiger counter for hunting down radioactive objects and measuring medium to high levels of radiation, but it&#8217;s not useful with low levels.</p>
<p>-Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

